Which model categorizes educational objectives into levels of cognitive complexity such as remembering and creating?

The correct choice is Bloom's revised taxonomy, which is a framework that organizes educational objectives into a hierarchy based on levels of cognitive complexity. It categorizes learning into six major categories: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. This framework helps educators design curriculum and assessment strategies that align with the intended cognitive outcomes for learners.

Bloom's revised taxonomy emphasizes not only the importance of lower-order thinking skills, such as remembering and understanding but also higher-order thinking skills like analyzing, evaluating, and creating. This structure is beneficial for establishing clear learning goals and measuring student progress across different levels of cognitive demand.

In contrast, Kolb's Learning Cycle focuses on experiential learning and the process of learning through experience. Pearson’s Assessment Framework is related to various assessment methods but does not specifically categorize cognitive objectives. Gardner's Multiple Intelligences theory proposes different types of intelligences rather than a hierarchy of cognitive skills. Therefore, Bloom's revised taxonomy is the most accurate model for categorizing educational objectives based on cognitive complexity.